SBF’s lawyers terminate FTX representation due to conflicts of interest

Attorney Martin Flumenbaum believed that Sam Bankman-Fried’s “incessant and disruptive tweeting” negatively impacted the reorganization efforts of the lawyers.

Paul, Weiss, the law firm backing FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) amid bankruptcy, renounced representing the entrepreneur, citing a conflict of interest. The decision to withdraw from representation after SBF’s tweets were found to disrupt the law firm’s reorganization efforts.

Starting Nov. 14, SBF published a series of tweets that amassed extensive attention across Crypto Twitter. The move, however, sparked speculations that the cryptic tweets were used to distract bots from noticing concurrently deleted tweets. While no ill-intent could be concluded, Paul, Weiss attorney Martin Flumenbaum believed that SBF’s “incessant and disruptive tweeting” was negatively impacting the reorganization efforts:

“We informed Mr. Bankman-Fried several days ago, after the filing of the FTX bankruptcy, that conflicts have arisen that precluded us from representing him.”

The law firm’s decision to back out from helping SBF coincided with a much-awaited ruling of fellow fraudster Elizabeth Homes, who got sentenced to prison after being convicted of criminal fraud.

SBF currently faces scrutiny from multiple directions, including ongoing investigations around the misuse of customer funds and disclosing of bankruptcy-related documents.

Despite informing the defendants, the court may refuse an attorney’s request and order them to continue representation — which may seem impossible considering SBF’s behaviorial concerns raised by the law firm.

Related: Sam Bankman-Fried says he regrets filing for bankruptcy: Report

Recently, Binance CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao opened up about the time when Binance was almost ready to bail out FTX from a collapse. Reflecting on the situation, he said:

“When he came to me, I knew he was desperate. If we can’t help him, there’s probably nobody else that would. Probably a bunch of people passed on the deal before us.”

However, the deal for a takeover was called off after a due diligence revealed bigger problems.

Related Posts

Fan tokens struggle to hold on as World Cup quarter-finals draw nearer

Soccer fan tokens have seen their prices and trading volumes plummet since the start of the World Cup on Nov. 20. Cryptocurrencies tied to national soccer teams have…

Gods Unchained Reveals First Festive NFT Card Set

Top web3 game Gods Unchained teams up with global blockchain company Immutable X to launch its first seasonal-themed card set in the game’s history. The Christmas-themed card…

GensoKishi Official Release | LAND Sales Coming in December

PRESS RELEASE. On November 30th, the MMORPG game “GensoKishi Online-Meta World” was officially released. It is the web 3 version of the iconic Japanese 3DMMO “Elemental Knights…

Here’s Alameda’s Investment Portfolio: WSJ Report

The Financial Times (FT) published a document on Tuesday exposing where Alameda’s venture investments went days before the FTX Group filed for bankruptcy.  Its hundreds of investments…

Court in China Recognizes NFTs as Virtual Property Protected by Law

A court in the Chinese city of Hangzhou has determined that non-fungible tokens, or NFTs, represent virtual property protected by the laws in the People’s Republic. The…

Cryptocurrency has become a playground for fraudsters

Currency speculation was once the preserve of banking institutions, governments, and investment funds. But with cryptocurrency, it’s being sold to the public as casino entertainment. News involving…

Generated by Feedzy